🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the legislation for further review if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries